The Golden Rule Check
If someone took your content as enough to act on, what could go wrong? Paste a piece and we’ll show you the sentence that opens the door, and how to rewrite it so it closes.
Your email, to open the tool
We send you a 6-digit code. Your email is used to give you access and to count your uses, so nobody can run the tool without limit. It is never attached to what you analyse.
Try The Myelin App with 10 analyses, free
What you just saw is one part of it. The Myelin is the whole kit: the auditor that rewrites the entire piece and scores it, the jurisdiction-aware risk checker, and the idea generator. Leave your email and your access arrives within a few hours, with 10 analyses on it.
No credit card, no expiry date, no sales call. The 10 analyses wait until you use them.
We send you the access and, every so often, a real piece analysed with these tools. Unsubscribe from any issue.
Why reformulate instead of warning
Clarity is not neutral: what is processed easily tends to feel more true, and for an audience with no clinical training that shortcut is stronger, not weaker. So a clear but incomplete claim travels further than the caveat you put at the end. Adding “check with your doctor” at the close does not change what the reader carries away — the headline is what gets remembered. What works is changing the main claim, so the sentence that survives in memory no longer permits the dangerous inference.
What this tool doesn’t do
It points at one inference, the most likely one, and rewrites one sentence. It does not check whether what you claim is clinically correct, does not weigh severity against reversibility against likelihood of misreading, does not apply the rewrite across the whole piece, and does not write the threshold at which a doubt justifies a consultation. And it never invents a figure you did not give.
What we keep from what you paste, and what we don’t
Nothing of your text survives. It isn’t stored, isn’t reused, doesn’t train anything.
Your email is used for two things: to give you access, and to count how many times you use each tool in a day, so one person can’t run it without limit. That is all we keep next to it: your email, the tool and the day. Not what you analysed.
Separately, with no email and dated by day, we keep the subject as two or three generic tags — “vitamin d supplementation”, “intermittent fasting” — and the class of finding that came out. That is what lets us write about the mistakes that repeat across medical content. Nothing links those rows to your email.
We also keep a fingerprint of your connection. It is not your IP: it is a code computed from it with a key only we hold, and without that key there is no way back to the IP.
The newsletter is optional. If you don’t tick the box, you get the code and nothing else, and the tools work exactly the same.
When you want the full analysis
The Myelin’s auditor takes this same question all the way: the three inferences your text permits, each weighed by severity, reversibility and likelihood of misreading, the rewrite applied across the whole piece, and the consultation threshold with the variable your reader cannot resolve alone.
See The MyelinThe other two, also free
AI-assisted analysis of your text’s structure. It does not replace your clinical judgement.